Adopt legal and science
based standards for the protection and health of native fish populations to
include the following:
·
Define the conservation management unit as the population by
watershed
·
Prevent the depletion of indigenous species in their native
habitats by managing for the protection and recovery of every population
·
Maintain and protect the life history and genetic diversity
of populations by species and watershed
·
Maintain and recover the adaptive and productive capacity of
each population by species and its supporting habitats recognizing that
managing for diversity will maximize production and species resiliency
·
Protect and restore habitats capacity to support life history
diversity of populations
·
Prevent interbreeding and ecological interactions between
hatchery and wild fish
·
Establish research program to support management and
increase knowledge of indigenous fish
·
Develop and fund a
monitoring and evaluation program to determine the efficacy of management
program
·
Inventory biological
diversity and establish a biological baseline for each population including
life history and genetic attributes
·
Determine smolt to
adult survival and smolts per female for each population by population and establish standards
·
Establish reference
watersheds and populations for long-term monitoring and evaluation
·
Establish long term
data base on life history and the biodiversity of populations and species
·
Establish optimum
freshwater, estuary, and marine habitat conditions for each life history stage
by species and set standards.
·
Establish a life
history and genetic diversity benchmark per population by species
·
Research will strive to validate management assumptions
·
Present program plan to
public and Oregon Fish and Wildlife Commission
Independent
Scientific Audit
·
Impanel an independent
scientific body to evaluate biological objectives, management plans and
research
·
Panel will identify
research needs and identify critical uncertainties
·
Meet annually and make
findings available to public
Funding
·
Fund monitoring,
evaluation and research at beginning of process
Hatchery
Management Goals
·
Establish legal and
science based standards for hatchery operations consistent with native, wild
fish conservation
·
Provide a cost
effective product for harvest
·
Reduce domestication
selection
·
Reduce stray rates to
less than 5%
·
Manage for maximum
number of families
·
Manage for maximum
effective breeding size
·
Support the wild fish
management goals
·
Smolt to adult survival rate per release group
·
Cost per adult per release group
·
Contribution to catch and to ecosystem criteria achieved?
·
Was domestication selection minimized?
·
Were stray rates within standards?
·
Were life history and genetic diversity criteria achieved?
·
Were the maximum number of families criteria achieved?
·
Was the production cost effective?
·
Was the maximum effective breeding size criteria achieved?
·
Was the hatchery operation supportive of native wild fish
management goals and was there any harm to the ecosystem?
·
Establish a legal and science based standards for harvest so
that it supports native, wild fish conservation standards
·
Harvest fish at sustainable levels while causing no harm to
the ecosystem
·
Harvest rate on native wild populations is less than 15%
·
Support native wild fish management goals
·
Establish and achieve spawner abundance goals by species per
population in each watershed
·
Support rebuilding goals by species and population
·
Harvest shall be cost effective
·
Establish spawner abundance goals by species and stock in
each stream
·
Establish spawner abundance criteria to fully seed habitat
by species
·
Establish nutrient enrichment criteria from salmonid
carcasses by species and watershed
·
Maintain the natural distribution and abundance for each
population in streams
·
Maintain life history and genetic characteristics by species
and population
·
Support rebuilding and recovery actions for declining
populations
·
Provide a public review of harvest evaluation relative to
these criteria.
·
Were the harvest management goals achieved by species and
population in watersheds?
·
Was harvest consistent with native wild fish management
goals?
·
Were spawner abundance goals achieved?
·
Were standards and criteria achieved?