NATIVE FISH SOCIETY P.O. Box 19570 Portland, Oregon 97280 (503) 977-0287 Email: bmbakke@teleport.com May 20, 1998 Ms. Donna Darm Protected Species Program National Marine Fisheries Service Northwest Region 7600 Sand Point Way, NE Bin C15700, Bldg. 1 Seattle, WA 98115-0070 RE: Listed steelhead passage at mainstem dams and fishway maintenance schedules Dear Ms. Darm: This letter follows up on our conversation where I altered you to the possible conflict of fish passage maintenance and passage of listed steelhead at mainstem dams on the Columbia and Snake rivers. About a decade ago there was a controversy regarding the maintenance of fishways at mainstem COE operated dams on the Columbia and Snake rivers. This issue has come up again. There is scientific evidence, based on radio tagging and passage observations of summer steelhead overwintering in the mainstem Columbia and Snake rivers. When water temperatures begin to moderate in February and March these fish resume upstream migration to their spawning areas. If mainstem dams have fishways out of service due to maintenance, then these fish are delayed. The effect of this delay is unknown, but these fish often have a considerable distance to travel and it can be assumed that delay does not work in their favor. I am asking you and your agency to make sure fishway maintenance is not creating a migration barrier for listed and non-listed steelhead. This problem was brought to my attention by a member who caught numerous wild steelhead below John Day Dam this February. These fish were not finclipped and were of large size, suggesting they were B-run fish. All wild fish, of course, were released. This person also noted that he did not think the fishway was operating at John Day Dam. Would you please inquire about this possible conflict between routine maintenance by the COE of its fishways and the ESA. I would greatly appreciate it. It seems that this problem, if it still exists, could be resolved rather easily. Sincerely, Bill M. Bakke, Director