OREGON PROPOSES COHO HATCHERY ZONE The Oregon Coho Plan replaces a listing of coho as a federal protected species from Cape Blanco to the Columbia River. A purpose of the Oregon Plan, according to the MOA between Oregon and the National Marine Fisheries Service is to: "restore natural coastal salmon populations and fisheries to productive and sustainable levels..." But not for the Salmon River on Oregon's north coast, the area where the largest, most troubling coho salmon decline is evident, The plan is to delete natural production.. According to an Oregon Department of Fish and Wildlife memo of May 5, 1997, the Salmon River coho would be dropped as a wild coho salmon stream by administrative action on the part of the ODFW commission. This means that wild coho salmon would no longer be protected under the state's wild fish management policy, and the whole watershed would be turned over to hatchery coho production. This move is in stark contrast to the best available scientific information that endorses the protection of biological diversity among and within native salmonid populations. This is vital to the conservation of the species and the benefits they supply society. As a result of the Salmon River Hatchery and decades of excessive harvest rates in the Ocean directed at hatchery fish by the state of Oregon and the Pacific Fishery Management Council, the ODFW says: "...a self-sustaining wild coho population no longer existed in the Salmon River." The ODFW staff is recommending the state wildlife commission "remove the Salmon River wild coho from the wild fish population list." This proposal would concentrate the release of hatchery coho in the Salmon River to feed the industrial fishery in the ocean, should it ever reopen. By concentrating hatchery coho production in the Salmon River, the memo suggests, would zone the Salmon River as a hatchery stream and lead to "minimal hatchery coho smolt releases into other watersheds and thereby protect wild coho." The threat of listing wild coho salmon as a federal protected species has caused the state of Oregon to rethink its coho management program. Rather than dump hatchery fish in every watershed to subsidize the industrial ocean fisheries, the plan is to now zone the coast into hatchery watersheds. The Salmon River proposal is the first effort by the ODFW to accomplish this goal without publicly announcing it, preferring to accomplish the plan piecemeal. This proposal comes early in the Oregon Coho Plan process and is probably no accident, for it would allow the state to begin implementing its hatchery zone plan before the species is potentially listed by the National Marine Fisheries Service. The memo states that 90% of the naturally spawning coho are of hatchery origin since 1990, and only 82 naturally produced coho, on average, return to 42 miles of spawning habitat in the Salmon River basin. The Oregon Coho Plan calls for 42 wild fish per mile. This means the Salmon River is getting only about 2 coho spawners per mile. The proposal to delete the Salmon River from the wild fish policy and releasing the ODFW from meeting agency standards for wild coho salmon in the watershed would effectively expand the Hatchery Management Extinction Zone of the lower Columbia River coho streams to coastal watersheds. On the Columbia River, the coho spawners have declined to less than one adult per mile. In the 1970s the ODFW decided to maximize the harvest of Columbia River hatchery coho by eliminating any wild coho spawning requirements in tributaries, saying that by releasing hatchery smolts into these tributaries natural production could be maintained. Well, that theory did not work out, and the National Marine Fisheries Service said the lower Columbia River coho were not warranted for listing because no distinct native population could be found to list. This creates the odd circumstance where coho are declared extinct when there are coho salmon around. But they are all hatchery coho. Oregon scientists have raised the issue that once a native coho population declines to a very low level, conservation efforts do not result in an increase in the population size. For example, drastically reduced harvest rates have not resulted in increased coho adult spawners in the lower Columbia River nor in northern Oregon coastal streams south of the Columbia River. One theory goes, that there are so few spawners that the fish cannot find mates. There is also the theory that the predator base has built up around hatchery coho releases and creates a barrier to native coho recovery. This scenario is the logical result of the industrial model of fishery management where the native coho, and the biological diversity they represent, are less important to fishery management than are hatchery coho bred and released in extensive hatchery system for harvest. Under Governor Kitzhaber's Oregon Coho Plan, the state is flirting with disaster if it proceeds to zone the coastal watersheds for hatchery coho salmon production and ignores the science that says this approach is a formula for failure. The evidence is in, but the state of Oregon is still dedicated to its old ways. The industrial model of salmon management over the last 120 years has caused the wild coho to decline to 5% of its historic abundance, closed fisheries, and reduced benefits to society. The proposal to delete the Salmon River coho from the list of wild coho streams in Oregon continues the myth of Industrial fish management when Oregon should be actively carrying out a strategy to restore its native coho salmon. ------------------------------------------ end -------------------------------------------